Pancha-mahabhutas: the five subtle constituents of matter

If everything is consciousness (Brahman), then how does this conscious energy put on the appearance of material solidity.  Why does the table appear solid?  In order to bridge the gulf between consciousness and apparently durable matter, ancient Indian sages postulated (or “divined”) that all physical things are constituted of five subtle elements  called Pancha-Mahabhutas – earth, fire, water, air, ether.  These are not the elements known in the conventional sense (e.g. “water” does not imply the water, and “earth” does not mean soil) but are actually subtle conditions which together create the perception of forms which can be sensed by the human mind.  The actual names of these five elements are Akasha (ether), Vayu(aeriality), Agni(fire), Apas(liquidity) and Prithvi(compaction).  The descriptions of these five constituents are quite similar across Sankhya, Tantra and Buddhist philosophy and even Greek Stoic texts.  Furthermore, as I point out later in this article, what is amusing is that these five elements were codified, probably inadvertently, in the Vishnu iconography seen in Indian temples!

It is profitable (profiter as the French say) to compare a variety of interpretations to discover the underlying meaning.  The principal sources that we rely on are Sri Aurobindo’s interpretation based on Sankhya, Arthur Avalon’s interpretation based on Tantra, J.C. Chatterji’s presentation of Kashmir Shaivism, the Buddhist presentation as given in the Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakosa, as well as extant Greek Stoic texts.  As we see, there is remarkable convergence in all these interpretations.

An ocean of electric Energy
Formlessly formed its strange wave-particles
Constructing by their dance this solid scheme,
Its mightiness in the atom shut to rest;
Masses were forged or feigned and visible shapes;
Light flung the photon’s swift revealing spark
And showed, in the minuteness of its flash
Imaged, this cosmos of apparent things.
Thus has been made this real impossible world,
An obvious miracle or convincing show.

(Sri Aurobindo, Savitri, Book II, Canto 5)

Sankhya perspective as given by Sri Aurobindo

The following text is culled from a few sources (1, 2, 3, 4) in which Sri Aurobindo expounded his interpretation of the five elements:

  1. Ether or Akasha: The elementary state of material Force is, in the view of the old Indian physicists, a condition of pure material extension in Space of which the peculiar property is vibration typified to us by the phenomenon of sound.
  2. Air or Vayu: Vibration in the state of ether is not sufficient to create forms. There must first be some obstruction in the flow of the Force ocean, some contraction and expansion, some interplay of vibrations, some impinging of force upon force so as to create a beginning of fixed relations and mutual effects. Material Force modifying its first ethereal status assumes a second, called in the old language the aerial, of which the special property is contact between force and force, contact that is the basis of all material relations.  Furthermore, he said that it is this principle, Vayu, which is the support of all contact and exchange, the cause of gravitation and of the fields (magnetic and electric).
  3. Fire or Agni: Ether and Air do not beget real forms but only varying forces. A sustaining principle is needed. This is provided by a third self-modification of the primitive Force of which the principle of light, electricity, fire and heat is for us the characteristic manifestation.  Fire is threefold: ordinary fire(Jala Agni), electric fire(Vaidyuta Agni), solar fire (Saura Agni).
  4. Liquidity or Apas:  Even with the above three, we can have forms of force preserving their own character and peculiar action, but not stable forms of Matter. A fourth state characterised by diffusion and a first medium of permanent attractions and repulsions, termed picturesquely water or the liquid state.
  5. Earth or Prithvi: There is then a fifth state which is needed for cohesion, termed earth or the solid state, and this completes the necessary elements.

All forms of Matter of which we are aware, all physical things even to the most subtle, are built up by the combination of these five elements. Upon them also depends all our sensible experience; for by reception of vibration comes the sense of sound; by contact of things in a world of vibrations of Force the sense of touch; by the action of light in the forms hatched, outlined, sustained by the force of light and fire and heat the sense of sight; by the fourth element the sense of taste; by the fifth the sense of smell. All is essentially response to vibratory contacts between force and force.  In this way the ancient thinkers bridged the gulf between pure Force and its final modifications and satisfied the difficulty which prevents the ordinary human mind from understanding how all these forms which are to his senses so real, solid and durable can be in truth only temporary phenomena and a thing like pure energy, to the senses non-existent, intangible and almost incredible, can be the one permanent cosmic reality.

In a conversation with Pavitra, a French disciple,  Sri Aurobindo expatiated that “these elements constitute only the grossest part of the physical plane.  Immediately behind it is the physical-vital, the principle of life that is latent in matter.  J. C. Bose is contacting this element in his experiment (here, he is alluding to the Bose’s experiments on metal fatigue. For more, see Bose and electrical response in metals) Beyond that layer lies the mind of matter. This mind has a far different form than the human mind, still it is a manifestation of the same principle of organisation.  And deep below there are two more hidden layers… That is the occult knowledge concerning the physical plane only” (3).

Pancha-Mahabhutas : five subtle elements

Kashmir Shaivism

Kashmir Shaivism was founded by Abhinavagupta in the 8th century C.E.  To learn more on the general philosophy, see wikipedia page on Kashmir_Shaivism.  Here, we will focus solely on its exposition of the five elements as provided in J.C. Chatterji’s book “Kashmir Shaivism” (5).  What follows is a brief summary from that book.

There are five factors that constitute what may be termed the “materiality of the sensible universe”:

1. The principle of Vacuity (Avakasha), technically “Akasha” and literally the Sky, the bright shining Firmament.  This is nothing but “Dishah” or directions – the lines of Force radiating everywhere.  These lines are symbolized as the “hairs” of Shiva who is therefore called Vyomakesha (he whose hairs are made of Vyoman – Vyoman is a name for both space and direction).  It is these lines of Force which uphold all things in the Universe in their various positional relations.  The simile of all Space, and indeed the whole universe, being thus woven like a cloth is encountered several times in the Veda.

2. The principle of Aeriality, technically “Vayu”, and literally Air or the aerial atmosphere.  Vayu is required in order to create variation in the uniform and homogenous “temperature” created by Akasha (Ether).

3. The principle of what may be called Formativity. i.e. the Formative or Form building principle, technically “Agni” and literally Fire.   In the varied play, some power is needed which produces, transforms and destroys forms.  This burning and flaring up into various shapes and forms is called Agni or Fire.

4. The principle of Liquidity, technically “api”, and literally Water.

5. The principle of Solidity or Stability, technically called the Prithivi or Dharanitattva , literally Earth.

Tantra perspective

The British orientalist Sir John Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon) elucidated the Tantra perspective on the five elements in his book “Serpent Power” (6).  The following passage is excerpted from the book:

“…there are certain motions or forces (five in number) which produce solid matter, and which are ultimately reducible to ether (Akasa)…Akasa is one of the gross forces into which the Primordial Power (Prakrti Sakti) differentiates itself.  Objectively considered it is a vibration in and of the substance of Prakriti of which it is a transformation in which the other forces are observed to be operating….At the back of both “matter” and mind, there is the creative energy (Sakti) of the Supreme who is the cause of the universe and Consciousness itself. Matter affects the Jiva (soul) in five different ways, giving rise in him to the sensations of smell, taste, sight, touch and feel, and hearing….

From the Sabda-Tanmatra and from the combinations of the latter with the other Tanmatras are produced the gross Bhutas (Mahabhuta), which as things of physical magnitude perceivable by the senses approach the Western definition of discrete sensible “matter”. These five Mahabhutas are Akasa (Ether), Vayu (Air), Tejas (Fire), Apas (Water) and Prithvi (Earth). Their development takes place from the Tanmatra, from one unit of that which is known in sensible matter as mass (Tamas), charged with energy (Rajas) by the gradual accretion of mass and redistribution of energy. The result of this is that each Bhuta is more gross than that which precedes it until “Earth” is reached. These five bhutas have no connection with the English “elements” so called, nor, indeed, are they elements at all, being derived from the Tanmatras. Dynamically and objectively considered they are (proceeding from Akasa) said to be five forms of motion, into which Prakriti differentiates itself:

  1. Akasha: non-obstructive, all-directed motion radiating lines of force in all directions, symbolized as the “Hairs of Siva” affording the space in which the other forces operate;
  2. Vayu: transverse motion and locomotion in space.
  3. Agni: upward motion giving rise to expansion.
  4. Apas: downward motion giving rise to contraction.
  5. Prithvi: that motion which produces cohesion, its characteristic of obstruction being the opposite of the non-obstructive ether in which it exists and from which it and the other Tattvas spring.

…These Bhutas(elements) when compounded make up the material universe.…Matter, thus exists in the five states etheric, aerial, fiery, fluid, and solid.  Prithvi does not denote merely what is popularly called “Earth”.  All solid (Parthiva) odorous substance is in the Prithvi(earth) state. All substance in the fluid (Apya) state is in the Apas(liquid) state, as everything which has cohesive resistance is in that of Prithvi. This latter, therefore, is the cohesive vibration, the cause of solidity, of which the common earth is a gross compounded form.  All matter in the aerial (Vayava) condition is in the Vayu state. These are all primary differentiations of cosmic matter into a universe of subtly fine motion.”

Avalon further adds that “according to Western notions, it is the air which is the cause of sound. According to Indian notions, Ether is the substratum (Asraya) of sound, and Air (Vayu) is a helper (Sahakari) in its manifestation.” (6)

Buddhist perspective presented by Vasubandhu

Vasubandhu (4th C.E) was a prominent Buddhist philosopher.   The Buddhist interpretation of the elements is taken from his book Abhidharmakosa.  Yasomitra wrote a commentary called Sphutartha Abhidharmakosa-vyakhya  on the Abhidharmakosa.  Among the recent books expounding on this scripture are Sukomal Chaudhuri’s Analytical Study of Abhidharmakosa and Louis De La Vallee Poussin’s Abhidharmakoshabhasyam.

The four elements are discussed in verses 11-13 of Chapter 1 called “Dhatunirdesa” in the Abhidharmakosa.  It is noteworthy that the elements are referred to as Forces rather than Matter.  Also note that unlike the other systems, Vasubandhu discusses only four rather than five elements. He states:

  1. Earth provides Supporting Force
  2. Water provides Cohesion Force
  3. Fire provides Ripening Force
  4. Air provides Expanding Force

Chaudhuri presents Yasomitra’s commentary in his book:

“Yasomitra explains how these great elements are interdependent.  If we analyse any one of these elements, say earth, we will observe that together with the atoms of earth it contains at least one atom, if not more, of water, fire and air. But as the atoms of earth predominate here, we call it earth. Thus, though the great elements (Mahabhutas) arise together, in all molecules, hard, moist, hot or mobile, for the time being the nature of one predominates and our senses notice only the predominating one and not the others. We, therefore, say: this is earth; this is water; this is fire; this is air. So each and every material object is the combination of the four great elements. Even the derivative material dharmas(laws) of the Rupaskandha(matter aggregrate) are nursed by the four great elements as an infant prince is fed, bathed, dressed and fanned by others.  (7)

Greek Stoic philosophy

The Stoic school of philosophy in Greece was started by Zeno under a porch (i.e. Stoa).  There are several noteworthy similarities between the Indian philosophies and the Stoic philosophy, as pointed out by McEvilley in his book (8).  The couple of passages below from extant Stoic scriptures pertain to the five elements:

God, Intelligence, Fate, and Zeus are all one, and many other names are applied to him. In the beginning, all by himself, he turned the entire substance through air into water. Just as the sperm is enveloped in the seminal fluid, so god, who is the seminal principle of the world, stays behind as such in the moisture, making matter serviceable to himself for the successive stages of creation.  He then creates first of all the Four Elements: fire, water, air, earth. (Diogenes Laertius 7.135-6)

The world, they hold, comes into being when its substance has first been converted from fire through air into moisture, and then the coarser part of the moisture has condensed as earth, while that whose particles are fine has been turned into air, and this process of rarefaction goes on increasing till it generates fire. Thereupon out of these elements animals and plants and all other natural kinds are formed by their mixture (Diogenes Laertius 7.142)

Although the ordering of the elements is a little different, the process resembles the other systems that we have seen above: there is a modification of the primordial substance with fire converting into air, then water and finally into earth.

Vishnu iconography

Now we will examine what seems to be a rather curious and amusing link between these elements and Vishnu iconography which is used in Vaishnava temples !

In the Vaishnavite tradition of Hinduism, Vishnu is supposed to be the Supreme and he is said to have had four expansions (Chatur-Vyuha) : Vasudeva, Sankarsana, Pradyumna, Aniruddha, as per the Kurma Purana, Agni Purana (48.13) and Vishnu Purana (V.18.58) (9).  The Garuda Purana goes a step further and refers to the five forms of Vishnu (Pancha-tatvarchana) – Vasudeva, Sankarsana, Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Narayana (9).  In a conversation recorded in 1910, Sri Aurobindo spoke of the “divine principle, enmeshed in a quadruple sheath of Vasudeva, Sankarshan, Pradyumna and Aniruddha” (10).  The Shanti Parva of the Mahabharata alludes to this transformation as well:

… When He (Vishnu) becomes Jiva, He comes to be called Sankarshana. Next, He transforms Himself into Pradyumna and then into Aniruddha. In this way, the high-souled Krishna, who has Himself for His origin divides (or displays) Himself in fourfold form. Desirous of creating this universe which consists of the fivefold primal elements. (11)

These names seem to have been chosen with care, because their Sanskrit meanings indicate a connection to the five elements discussed above:

  1. Vasudeva is “that in which all things abide”, indicating the element Ether.
  2. Sankarsana indicates “squeezing together.” [Samyak(complete) + Akarshan(attraction)], indicating the element of Aeriality.
  3. Pradyumna means the “radiant one”, indicating the element Fire.
  4. Aniruddha in Sanskrit means “without obstacles”, indicating liquidity or Water.
  5. Narayana: In Sanskrit, another name for water is Nara so Narayana means “one who floats on Water”, which is the previous element.  Hence, Narayana probably indicates Earth.

Thus these expansions of Vishnu seem to have a correspondence with the five elements.

The chatur-vyuha (four expansions) of Vishnu was later reified and became the basis for Vishnu iconography.  Based on these expansions, the Pancharatra theology within Vaisnavism developed four-headed idols of Vishnu (called Chatumurti-Vishnu) which came to be worshipped in temples.  You can see some of the idols at the links given below.  This is an outstanding example of how cosmological insights of sages were transformed into external forms of worship suitable for the masses !!

  1. Four-headed Vishnu at the Huntingon Archive:
  2. Vishnu Caturmurti at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art

Conclusion

It is not clear whether these five elements have any correspondence with modern-day physics.  However, it is worth noting that in the first section above, Sri Aurobindo said that Vayu is the “support of all contact and exchange, the cause of gravitation and of the fields (magnetic and electric)”.  This concept bears close resemblance to the four forces – strong nuclear, weak nuclear, electromagnetic and gravity – that modern physics seeks to integrate into a unified theory.

In 1989, John Hagelin, a particle physicist and Director at the Maharishi University of Management, claimed that there is a striking correspondence between these five tanmatras and the five quantum-mechanical spin types of a unified quantum field theory (12).  He proposed the following parallels:

  • between the akasha or “space” and the gravitational field;
  • between the vayu or “air” tanmatra, which stands as a link between space and the other tanmatras, and the gravitino field;
  • between the tejas or “fire” tanmatra, responsible for chemical transformations and the sense of sight, and the spin-1 force fields;
  • and between the apas and prithivi (“water” and “earth”) tanmatras and the spin-1/2 and spin-0 matter fields, respectively

Well, this is an open question and we leave it on that note.

References

  1. Sri Aurobindo.  Essays on the Gita, CWSA vol. 21, p 72
  2. Sri Aurobindo.  Life Divine, CWSA vol. 21, p 88.
  3. Talk between Sri Aurobindo and Pavitra dated 8 May 1926.  It first appeared in the Sri Aurobindo Circle Number 8, 1952, pp. 99-102.
  4. Sri Aurobindo.  Isha Upanishad, CWSA vol. 17, pp. 247-250.
  5. J.C Chatterji. Kashmir Shaivism, Albany: SUNY Press, 1986, pp 8, 91-101, 119
  6. Arthur Avalon. Serpent Power, New York: Dover, 1974, pp 68-71
  7. Sukomal Chaudhuri. Analytical study of the Abhidharmakosa, Calcutta, Sanskrit College, 1976, p 77
  8. Thomas McEvilley. The Shape of Ancient Thought, New York, Allworth Press 2002.
  9. N.P. Joshi. Iconography of Balarama, pp 10-12 (google books) 
  10. Documents in the Life of Sri Aurobindo, In Chandernagore, http://www.sriaurobindoashram.org/research/show.php?set=doclife&id=22
  11. Mahabharata. Shanti Parva.  http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m13/m13b123.htm
  12. John Hagelin. Restructuring physics from its foundation in light of Maharishi’s Vedic Science, Modern Science and Vedic Science 3, 1989, pp 3-72  http://www.mum.edu/pdf_msvs/v03/hagelin.pdf

Related Posts

  1. The latent Consciousness within Matter
  2. Kundalini in ancient Greek and other non-Indian cultures
  3. Study of science as an aid in Yoga
  4. Similarities between Sumerian Anki and Vedic Agni by Jean-Yves Lung
  5. Spacetime in occult worlds
  6. Man the microcosm, Universe the macrocosm
  7. Vedic Vak: four levels of sound
  8. Vedic Vak: illustration of Para Vak
  9. Perception of Time changes with the concentration of consciousness
  10. Twelve occult dimensions


Advertisements

22 thoughts on “Pancha-mahabhutas: the five subtle constituents of matter

      1. Hari

        Hi Sandeep

        Please read Being Different by Rajiv Malhotra which explains why our Hindu concepts and phrases cannot be translated or mapped onto Western thought.

        Thanks

        Hari

      2. Sandeep Post author

        Already read the book but I don’t believe it applies to this particular topic

      3. Hari

        I think it does. For one we do not need Western interpretation of our scriptures to understand our own. Sri Aurobindo, Sri Sri Sankaracharya etc have expounded on these like several others. We all seem to look for Western acceptance of our heritage due to our inferiority comples. Your quoting of these foreign authors is an example.
        I would suggest you listen to Rajivji’s youtube videos, he is the smartest person I have met, IQ well over 200 in my opinion, extremely well read, debated leading Indologists etc.
        My humble thoughts.

      4. Sandeep Post author

        I know Rajiv quite well. It is a mistake to assume that any Indian who quotes Western authors for support is doing so out of an inferiority complex.

        The Greek Stoics I refer to above might have developed a parallel philosophy of their own. See my earlier post on Kundalini in ancient Greece. The analogies to particle physics that I quote above are merely musings on another person’s work. They should not be assumed to be endorsements of John Hagelin’s ideas.

        If you have interest in this subject, I suggest you should go beyond the springboard that Rajiv has provided and learn independently on your own to appreciate the finer points in the matter (no pun intended!).

      5. Hari

        I appreciate your point however Greeks have borrowed a lot of Indian ideas. Our lack of Sanskrutam knowledge and Sruti traditions makes many rely on other publications. I do not have the level of your intellect I realize, can only request if you could work more with Rajivji as you know he needs support from academics like you, no pun intended.

  1. Mohan

    In the tradition of Sri Ramanujacharya, at least, it is understood that the Vyuha forms of Vishnu are connected to the 4 states of waking, dreaming, deep sleep and Turiya. Aniruddha, binds the Jivaatma to the deha and enables him to function through it. Pradhyumna is responsible for the dream state while Sankarshana is connected to the divine embrace in deep sleep.

    This is the Pancaraatric understanding I believe and so any Vaishnava school following it would have a similar understanding.

    Reply
    1. Sandeep Post author

      Cool, but it does seem to me that these names have some deeper meaning related to the elements. I am still investigating the origins of these names.

      I came across an article by Jan Gonda — “Vishnu’s name Aniruddha” where he does a survey of all the references to the names.

      Reply
  2. Francois Pitre

    Very interesting
    All these reference make me meet many enlightened point of view. Thanks.

    What could correspond to dark matter vs visible to our senses, our moment state, may reside where Aurobindo explain the “dynamic/static” state occuring with any manifestation.
    And “static” is today assimilate with “nothing” by the ignorance of it by the mental wich only exist as a dynamic.

    Reply
    1. Sandeep Post author

      I don’t know if dark matter would correspond to the static/dynamic distinction.

      As Sri Aurobindo states above, “immediately behind it [the five elements] is the physical-vital, the principle of life that is latent in matter….Beyond that layer lies the mind of matter…. And deep below there are two more hidden layers… That is the occult knowledge concerning the physical plane only

      I think dark matter would lie somewhere in the physical plane itself but I don’t know so your guess is as good as mine.

      Reply
  3. Jason Wingate

    IMO ether is something deeper than any form of matter, dark or otherwise! Related to akasha and void.

    I see you go aside to Stoicism here too, that’s great stuff, this will be a fun site for me to visit more and I really do thank you for the research. That Vishnu correspondence is not at all unlikely in my opinion. For example: of course in Greece the guy who is associated with the elements first is Empedocles, of whom Peter Kingsley wrote such interesting stuff. And in his poem on the subject he also gives the four elements as four deities whose properties are supposed to match those of the element. (However he doesn’t talk of the fifth…)

    Did you ever look at Franz Bardon? He designed an initiation system which is western/hermetic, but he also knew the hindu correspondences of the tattvas and talked about them. The system is interesting.

    I also talked a little about elemental use of the chakras on my last blog post, sorry to plug, but it’s a fun coincidence.

    In images like the monochord of Robert Fludd you see the four elements used as Bardon used them.

    Reply
    1. Sandeep Post author

      > this will be a fun site for me to visit more

      that will be great, Jason, because you can supplement my knowledge of ancient Greece. I plan to check out the books you mentioned

      Reply
  4. Sandeep Post author

    What makes matter appear solid, according to modern physics? Here is the answer from a physicist on an internet forum:

    What makes it solid is a combination of the uncertainty principle and Pauli’s exclusion principle.

    According to the uncertainty principle, electrons can’t have a well-defined position if they have a sufficiently well-defined momentum (mass times velocity). For the energy of electrons to be low enough, the momentum also has to be low enough. That also means that the uncertainty of the momentum has to be low enough.

    The uncertainty principle then implies that the uncertainty of the position of the electron has to be large enough, at least 0.1 nanometers or so – the atomic radius – for the kinetic energy to be smaller than a few electronvolts, a decent amount of energy that is comparable to the potential energy of electrons near protons if the electron clouds is similarly large.

    Pauli’s exclusion principle then guarantees that in each volume comparable to the volume of an atom, there can be at most 1 (or 2) electrons. That’s why matter is impenetrable….

    Read more at http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/9369/what-makes-matter-solid

    Reply
  5. ipi

    Why there is no such thing as empty space

    Could the universe have appeared out of nothing? In a previous video, we argued that typical notions of ‘something’ and ‘nothing’ don’t really make sense according to modern physics. But many commenters objected to this idea, calling it a semantic game. Surely there must be such a thing as a true void: no matter, no energy, no distance… just pure nothingness.

    In our latest animated explainer, we pick up where we left off and look at whether true nothingness is possible according to physics

    See:http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2011/11/why-there-is-no-such-thing-as-empty-space.html

    Reply
  6. Sandeep Post author

    Interesting parallels between 5th century Buddhist-Samkhya arguments and the 20th century Heisenberg-Schrödinger differences – discovered by David Harrison (Department of Physics, University of Toronto). The following text is from http://www.upscale.utoronto.ca/PVB/Harrison/DevelQM/DevelQM.html

    “Working essentially independently, in the mid-1920’s Heisenberg and Schrödinger both created a full form of Quantum Mechanics…

    Despite their radically different worldview, shortly after their publication it was shown that Matrix Mechanics and Wave Mechanics are mathematically identical. In fact, Schrödinger was one of the people who did the proof.

    Despite their formal equivalence, there seems to be more than just logic involved in the interpretation of the mathematics. For example, Heisenberg wrote:

    “The more I ponder the physical part of Schrðdinger’s theory, the more disgusting it appears to me.”

    while Schrödinger wrote:

    “If one has to stick to this damned quantum jumping, then I regret ever having been involved in this thing.”

    In the 5th century of the current era, there was a bitter argument in India between the Sankhya Hindus and the Buddhists about the nature of Universal Flux. Debates were held which lasted for days, and would attract huge crowds. According to the Buddhists:

    The phenomena consist of an infinity of discrete moments following one another almost without intervals…. There is no matter at all, flashes of energy follow one another and produce the illusion of stabilized phenomena. The universe is a staccato movement.

    while according to the Hindus:

    The phenomena are nothing but waves or fluctuations standing out upon the background of an eternal, all-pervading undifferentiated Matter with which they are identical. The universe represents a legato movement.

    Reference for hindu-buddhist debate: F. Theodor Stcherbatsky, Buddhist Logic, Vol I, pg 83.

    Even allowing for the possibility that Schrödinger’s Wave Mechanics may have been influenced by Hindu philosophy, the parallels between the Buddhist-Hindu argument and the Heisenberg-Schrödinger aesthetic clash are striking.”

    Reply
  7. Pingback: Predictions of Sri Aurobindo | Integral Yoga of Sri Aurobindo & The Mother

  8. Pingback: Consciousness Is the Unified Field by Dr. John Hagelin [Video]

Join the discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s